lakeville mn news

A little bit of a local news story today that caught my eye. Lakeville MN was hit by a tornado the other day. I’m in the business of tornado hunting, and this story caught my attention. It was a good story, but it really got to me though. I am a meteorologist by trade, so I know all of the stories that go into weather forecasting.

The tornado that hit Lakeville MN on Sunday was one of the worst natural disasters I’ve ever seen. It killed at least 7 people and left hundreds of homes and businesses damaged. At least 25 tornadoes, some of those pretty big ones, were reported in the area. Most of these tornadoes were rated as “life-threatening” and many of them were deadly.

The name of the tornado was a combination of the words “debris”, “debris-laden” and “debris-infested”.

That’s why this particular storm is so devastating. The storm was a combination of wind, rain, and hail. The worst part is that it came from a location where a tornado has been a few times, but these storms are rare.

The tornado that hit the Lakeville area was a little different. This one was called the “Lakeville Tower,” and it was rated as a “life-threatening” storm. That means it killed one person and injured several others, though none of the injured people were seriously hurt. The reason for the death is that the tornado destroyed a large chunk of the roof on a home.

It appears that the tornado was on the ground and the roof was flying. The home itself was not damaged, but the roof was torn off the home.

The home was a single-family residence, but it included a lake and a dock. The lake is an inland lake, meaning it was not surrounded by water. The lake was about 30 acres in size, and was surrounded by trees. It’s unclear if this lake was the home’s original location or if it was relocated to its current location after the tornado destroyed the roof.

I don’t think it was a tornado; if you live in an area and have a tornado, then it’s likely that a few homes in the area were seriously damaged. But I’m just guessing based on the amount of damage. I would think the floodwaters would have washed away the entire lake, and that would make the lake too small to be able to contain a body of water.

The lake is actually a small natural pond on the east side of the lake.

The thing is, the lake is actually a large natural pond on the east side of the lake. It is only on the east side because the lake is on the west side. The lake is actually a small natural pond on the east side of the lake. It is only on the east side because the lake is on the west side. The lake is actually a small natural pond on the east side of the lake. It is only on the east side because the lake is on the west side.