Newspapers are not the only documents that can be successfully funded by government grants. Every day, many schools and universities apply for a Wi Tomorrow grant in order to pay for wireless internet service for their students and staff. However, this may not be such a good idea. Why is this? It’s because you’ll actually be paying twice as much just to work with that same money.
The reason is the way these grants work; they’re not just funding wi-fi service but also hardware upgrades, like new computers or tablets. WI tomorrow grant is a grant that is awarded to schools and universities to find wi-fi service. These grants are not meant for the personal use of the grantee. Specifically, they are not meant for personal internet use at all.
Grantees who use grant funds for the personal use of internet service, or for other non-educational purposes may be considered in violation of the terms of a particular grant agreement and will have their funding reverted back to the academy/university from whence it came. Furthermore, some states have specific laws regarding this matter—the issue being that some states only allow grants to be used “for educational purposes’ ‘, not for private commercial benefit under any circumstance.
Ugly Truth About Wi Tomorrow Grant :
1. “The Government-Assisted IT Sector’s Exclusionary Economics”
In a country in which wireless technology is increasingly prevalent, it is important to understand what the government-assisted wireless technology expansion program has done and continues to do for the nation and its citizens. The history of government-assisted wireless technology expansion cannot be summarized in a few sentences.
Wireless technology is a fact of life, and not just in the United States. In fact, it is estimated that there are over 1 billion wireless devices being used worldwide at present (according to Cisco Systems) . The number of wireless devices is growing by leaps and bounds and is expected to reach at least 1.6 billion devices by the turn of the decade . As the pace of wireless technology’s expansion has continued to accelerate, it is important for policy-makers and consumers alike to be aware of how this expansion has been accomplished. Government-assisted, or “industry-led,” programs have been integral in helping both service providers and manufacturers continue their efforts towards the production of new wireless technologies at ever more competitive prices.
2. “How the Government Helped Wireless Expand”
During the mid-1980s, the United States Government began to take an aggressive stance in terms of applying technology to various aspects of the economy. President Reagan saw many areas where technology could be applied to benefit American citizens, and he began to initiate large spending plans that aimed to achieve these goals.
For example, in order to bolster American competitiveness, he signed a 1986 executive order that called for six major goals in this regard: 1) speeding technological development and application; 2) encouraging exports and protecting U.S. markets; 3) strengthening U.S. education and training; 4) improving the quality of U.S. health services; 5) stimulating work and personal welfare; 6) stimulating new private-sector participation in U.S. economic development .
An important aspect of this legislation was the funding that was created for each goal, which started at $1 billion per year . In many cases, this funding began to be channeled towards wireless technology research, in order to encourage American companies to begin producing telecommunications devices for the market and thus, help bolster their own financial investments.
3. “The Ugly Secret Behind Wi-Fi”
Microchip giant Intel was the key voice calling for the creation of a common industry organization to set Wi-Fi standards—an idea backed by Microsoft, Dell, and others. Intel proposed a non-profit that would collect dues from members, who would vote on how their dollars are spent. The group’s first big task was developing a standard for 802.11g , which launched in 2003 . That amounted to an early end run around the IEEE, the computing industry’s usual standards body.
4. “The Ugly Secret Behind Wi-Fi”
In the past, the Federal Communications Commission has generally been viewed as being biased towards over-regulating new technologies. For example, in 1962, the FCC ruled that all radio transmitters had to be licensed by a federal agency . In 1978, it passed tougher restrictions on electronic devices . In 1987, it decided to require that any new TV receivers include noise-canceling and stereo sound .
Despite these apparent bias patterns in its long history, the FCC’s standards division and equipment bureau officially welcomed Wi-Fi for review in February 2000 . (The bureau already had a list of approved radio frequencies. Wi-Fi would work on any of those frequencies, and it does.) There’s an important difference between the FCC and the US Department of Commerce. The FCC’s rules are for radio, not for wireless technology. The FCC is concerned with radio’s harmful effects on people’s bodies, not the devices that use radio frequencies. With regard to wireless devices, the FCC has generally followed a “benign neglect” policy in that it doesn’t regulate them much at all .
